<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>elisa freschiK.C. Bhattacharyya on the history of philosophy &#8211; elisa freschi</title>
	<atom:link href="https://elisafreschi.com/2019/01/08/k-c-bhattacharyya-on-the-history-of-philosophy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://elisafreschi.com</link>
	<description>These pages are a sort of virtual desktop of Elisa Freschi. You can find here my cv and some random thoughts on Sanskrit (and) Philosophy. All criticism welcome! Contributions are also welcome!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 19:06:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>K.C. Bhattacharyya on the history of philosophy</title>
		<link>https://elisafreschi.com/2019/01/08/k-c-bhattacharyya-on-the-history-of-philosophy/</link>
		<comments>https://elisafreschi.com/2019/01/08/k-c-bhattacharyya-on-the-history-of-philosophy/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 07:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elisa freschi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[contemporary Indian philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elise Coquereau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K.C. Bhattacharyya]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elisafreschi.com/?p=2991</guid>

				<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The historian here cannot begin his work at all unless he can live in sympathy into the details of an apparently outworn creed and recognise the truth in the first imperfect adumbrations of it. The attitude of the mere narrator has, in the case of the historian of philosophy, to be exchanged, as far as [&#8230;]]]></description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The historian here cannot begin his work at all unless he can live in sympathy into the details of an apparently outworn creed and recognise the truth in the first imperfect adumbrations of it. The attitude of the mere narrator has, in the case of the historian of philosophy, to be exchanged, as far as possible, for that of the sympathetic interpreter. There is the danger, no doubt, of too easily reading one&#8217;s philosophic creed into the history, but the opposite danger is more serious still. It is the danger of taking the philosophic type studied as a historic curiosity rather than a recipe for the human soul, and of seeking to explain the curiosity by natural causes instead of seriously examining its merits as philosophy. This unfortunately is sometimes the defect of Western expositions of Eastern philosophy and religion.&#8221;</p>
<p><small>(K.C. Bhattacharyya, Studies in Philosophy, Motilal Banarsidas, 1983, p. 2 &#8212;Thanks to Elise Coquereau-Saouma for the pointer).</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			

		<wfw:commentRss>https://elisafreschi.com/2019/01/08/k-c-bhattacharyya-on-the-history-of-philosophy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2991</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>