<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>elisa freschiIs anything at all understood out of false sentences? &#8211; elisa freschi</title>
	<atom:link href="https://elisafreschi.com/2017/11/20/is-anything-at-all-understood-out-of-false-sentences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://elisafreschi.com</link>
	<description>These pages are a sort of virtual desktop of Elisa Freschi. You can find here my cv and some random thoughts on Sanskrit (and) Philosophy. All criticism welcome! Contributions are also welcome!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 19:06:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Is anything at all understood out of false sentences?</title>
		<link>https://elisafreschi.com/2017/11/20/is-anything-at-all-understood-out-of-false-sentences/</link>
		<comments>https://elisafreschi.com/2017/11/20/is-anything-at-all-understood-out-of-false-sentences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 14:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elisa freschi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology of testimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language and linguistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mīmāṃsā]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nyāya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veṅkaṭanātha/Vedānta Deśika]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elisafreschi.com/?p=2616</guid>

				<description><![CDATA[Before answering that you do obviously understand something out of false sentences, too, consider that this would lead to: —distinguishing between understanding the meaning of a sentence and knowing it to be true —assuming a non-committal understanding of the meaning of a sentence —understanding fitness as a requirement for the sentence meaning (yogyatā) as limited [&#8230;]]]></description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before answering that you do obviously understand something out of false sentences, too, consider that this would lead to:</p>
<p>—distinguishing between understanding the meaning of a sentence and knowing it to be true</p>
<p>—assuming a non-committal understanding of the meaning of a sentence</p>
<p>—understanding fitness as a requirement for the sentence meaning (yogyatā) as limited to the lack of obvious inconsistencies and not as regarding truth</p>
<p>—(possibly) assuming that the meaning of a sentence is not an entity out there (since there is no out-there entity in the case of false sentences), but rather a mental one</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>If you are now inclined to say that Indian authors on a whole could not answer yes to the question in the title, read the following sentence by Veṅkaṭanātha:</p>
<blockquote><p>
śaśaviṣāṇavākyād api bodho jāyata eva</p>
<p>Also out of the sentence claiming that hares have horns (e.g., out of an obviously false sentence), an awareness does indeed arise (SM ad 1.1.25, 1971 edition p. 114).
</p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			

		<wfw:commentRss>https://elisafreschi.com/2017/11/20/is-anything-at-all-understood-out-of-false-sentences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
				<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2616</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>