<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>elisa freschiWhy is postcolonial Indian philosophy understudied? &#8211; elisa freschi</title>
	<atom:link href="https://elisafreschi.com/2017/09/05/why-is-postcolonial-indian-philosophy-understudied/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://elisafreschi.com</link>
	<description>These pages are a sort of virtual desktop of Elisa Freschi. You can find here my cv and some random thoughts on Sanskrit (and) Philosophy. All criticism welcome! Contributions are also welcome!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 19:06:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Why is postcolonial Indian philosophy understudied?</title>
		<link>https://elisafreschi.com/2017/09/05/why-is-postcolonial-indian-philosophy-understudied/</link>
		<comments>https://elisafreschi.com/2017/09/05/why-is-postcolonial-indian-philosophy-understudied/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 08:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elisa freschi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[contemporary Indian philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open questions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elisafreschi.com/?p=2586</guid>

				<description><![CDATA[Some questions to ponder. As some readers will know already, a workshop on postcolonial Indian philosophy will take place in Vienna at the end of September. It will be closed by a round table and I started thinking about the questions I would like to discuss. Suggestions by the readers are welcome.: Is Raghuramaraju right in saying that Indian [&#8230;]]]></description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em id="gnt_postsubtitle" style="color:#770005;font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:1.3em;line-height:1.2em;font-weight:normal;font-style:italic;">Some questions to ponder</em></p> <p>As some readers will know already, a workshop on postcolonial Indian philosophy will take place in Vienna at the end of September. It will be closed by a round table and I started thinking about the questions I would like to discuss. <strong>Suggestions by the readers are welcome</strong>.:</p>
<ol>
<li>Is Raghuramaraju right in saying that Indian philosophers focus too much on their ancestors (classical period) and too little on their predecessors (18th&#8211;20th c.)?</li>
<li>What could be concretely done to let more people engage in postcolonial Indian philosophy?</li>
<li>Is this goal part of the general enterprise of creating more centres for the study of global philosophy or are there specific peculiarities conencted to postcolonial Indian philosophy only?</li>
<li>What are the concrete advantages of engaging with modern and contemporary Indian philosophy for philosophers? And for Sanskritists?</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			

		<wfw:commentRss>https://elisafreschi.com/2017/09/05/why-is-postcolonial-indian-philosophy-understudied/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2586</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>