<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>elisa freschiIs the monologue also a dialogue? &#8211; elisa freschi</title>
	<atom:link href="https://elisafreschi.com/2016/04/08/is-the-monologue-also-a-dialogue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://elisafreschi.com</link>
	<description>These pages are a sort of virtual desktop of Elisa Freschi. You can find here my cv and some random thoughts on Sanskrit (and) Philosophy. All criticism welcome! Contributions are also welcome!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 19:06:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Is the monologue also a dialogue?</title>
		<link>https://elisafreschi.com/2016/04/08/is-the-monologue-also-a-dialogue/</link>
		<comments>https://elisafreschi.com/2016/04/08/is-the-monologue-also-a-dialogue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2016 10:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elisa freschi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[comparative philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contemporary Indian philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy of religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daya Krishna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Buber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maurice Friedman]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elisafreschi.com/?p=2218</guid>

				<description><![CDATA[No, taught Martin Buber, since a monologue lacks the dimension of Otherness. He was so adamant about that, that he even applied it to the case of God. Maurice Friedman (Martin Buber. The Life of Dialogue, p. 82) describes the relation of God and each single human being as follows: If God did not need [&#8230;]]]></description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, taught Martin Buber, since a monologue lacks the dimension of Otherness. He was so adamant about that, that he even applied it to the case of God. Maurice Friedman (<em>Martin Buber. The Life of Dialogue</em>, p. 82) describes the relation of God and each single human being as follows:</p>
<blockquote><p>
If God did not need man, if man were simply dependant and nothing else, there would be no meaning to man&#8217;s life or to the world. &#8216;The world is not divine sport, it is divine destiny&#8217;.</p></blockquote>
<p>Martin Buber&#8217;s own words (<em>I and Thou</em>, p. 82) are even more direct:</p>
<blockquote><p>You know always in your heart that you need God more than everything; but do you not know too that God needs you&#8212;in the fullness of His eternity needs you? […] You need God, in order to be&#8212;and God needs you, for the very meaning of life. </p></blockquote>
<p>Somehow, I am not surprised that Maurice Friedman participated in one of  Daya Krishna&#8217;s <em>saṃvāda</em>s (one can read the transcripts in <em>Intercultural Dialogue and the Human image, Maurice Friedman at Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			

		<wfw:commentRss>https://elisafreschi.com/2016/04/08/is-the-monologue-also-a-dialogue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
				<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2218</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>