<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>elisa freschipada-vākya-pramāṇa… Since when? &#8211; elisa freschi</title>
	<atom:link href="https://elisafreschi.com/2015/06/18/pada-vakya-prama%E1%B9%87a-since-when/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://elisafreschi.com</link>
	<description>These pages are a sort of virtual desktop of Elisa Freschi. You can find here my cv and some random thoughts on Sanskrit (and) Philosophy. All criticism welcome! Contributions are also welcome!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 12:52:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>pada-vākya-pramāṇa… Since when?</title>
		<link>https://elisafreschi.com/2015/06/18/pada-vakya-prama%e1%b9%87a-since-when/</link>
		<comments>https://elisafreschi.com/2015/06/18/pada-vakya-prama%e1%b9%87a-since-when/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 19:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elisa freschi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mīmāṃsā]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nyāya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[śāstric Sanskrit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veṅkaṭanātha/Vedānta Deśika]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vyākaraṇa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jayanta]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elisafreschi.com/?p=1753</guid>

				<description><![CDATA[If you have read post-Classical śāstra, you will have certainly encountered the formulation above, describing the three foundational disciplines as focusing on words (pada), i.e., grammatical analysis in Vyākaraṇa sentences (vākya), i.e., textual linguistics in Mīmāṃsā means of knowledge (pramāṇa), i.e., epistemology in Nyāya The tripartition is handy and catchy, but clearly post-classical, also since [&#8230;]]]></description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have read post-Classical śāstra, you will have certainly encountered the formulation above, describing the three foundational disciplines as focusing on<br />
<strong>words</strong> (<em>pada</em>), i.e., grammatical analysis in Vyākaraṇa<br />
<strong>sentences</strong> (<em>vākya</em>), i.e., textual linguistics in Mīmāṃsā<br />
<strong>means of knowledge</strong> (<em>pramāṇa</em>), i.e., epistemology in Nyāya<span id="more-1753"></span></p>
<p>The tripartition is handy and catchy, but clearly post-classical, also since the idea of distinguishing schools according to their &#8220;forte&#8221; and studying each of them in a technical way is probably itself post-classical. Thus, when did the tripartition originate, and by whom? When and where did it become standard?<br />
As for the first question, until now, I have encountered it in Jayanta (10th c. Kashmīr), in a non-standard form, so that it may be thought that Jayanta lies just before its standardization.<br />
As for the last question, in the following quote by Veṅkaṭanātha (13th c. Tamil Nadu) the standardisation seems complete:</p>
<blockquote><p>
The knowers of the śāstra divide the śāstra into three, according to the division into words, sentences and means of knowledge.</p>
<p>(<em>padavākyapramāṇabhedena hi tredhā vibhajanti śāstraṃ śāstravidaḥ</em>)
</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>When and wher did you encounter this tripartition first?</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			

		<wfw:commentRss>https://elisafreschi.com/2015/06/18/pada-vakya-prama%e1%b9%87a-since-when/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
				<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1753</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>