<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>elisa freschiLinguistic Communication as an Instrument of Knowledge: A panel &#8211; elisa freschi</title>
	<atom:link href="https://elisafreschi.com/2015/06/12/linguistic-communication-as-an-instrument-of-knowledge-a-panel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://elisafreschi.com</link>
	<description>These pages are a sort of virtual desktop of Elisa Freschi. You can find here my cv and some random thoughts on Sanskrit (and) Philosophy. All criticism welcome! Contributions are also welcome!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:59:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Linguistic Communication as an Instrument of Knowledge: A panel</title>
		<link>https://elisafreschi.com/2015/06/12/linguistic-communication-as-an-instrument-of-knowledge-a-panel/</link>
		<comments>https://elisafreschi.com/2015/06/12/linguistic-communication-as-an-instrument-of-knowledge-a-panel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 14:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elisa freschi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[conference reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epistemology of testimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[language and linguistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mīmāṃsā]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nyāya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sāṅkhya-Yoga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vyākaraṇa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Akane Saito]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaṅkāra Śāstra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alessandro Graheli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arabic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniele Cuneo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malcolm Keating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maṇḍana Miśra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Lauri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marzenna Jakubczak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monika Nowakowksa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sphota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiziana Pontillo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valeria Melis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elisafreschi.com/?p=1727</guid>

				<description><![CDATA[I came back last week from Athens, were I had organised together with Malcolm Keating a panel on Linguistic Communication as an instrument of knowledge. I ended up framing the problem according to four basic questions, namely 1) What do we know? , 2) How (through which instrument of knowledge) do we know it?, 3) [&#8230;]]]></description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignleft" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/91/View_of_the_Acropolis_Athens_%28pixinn.net%29.jpg" alt="" width="441" height="187" />I came back last week from Athens, were I had organised together with Malcolm Keating a panel on Linguistic Communication as an instrument of knowledge. I ended up framing the problem according to four basic questions, namely 1) What do we know? , 2) How (through which instrument of knowledge) do we know it?, 3) What is the role of language as a medium?, 4) What is the role of the social context? <span id="more-1727"></span></p>
<p>Then, I suggested several possible answers to each of this question, as in the scheme below.</p></div>
<div>
<div class="" title="Page 1">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<p>1. What do we know?</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8212;  descriptive contents (i.e., statements about state of affairs, dealt with in the papers by Keating and Lauri)</li>
<li>&#8212;  prescriptive contents (i.e., commands, dealt with in the papers by Nowakowska and Freschi)</li>
<li>&#8212;  poetical contents (?) (which have been called also &#8216;affective contents&#8217;, dealt with in the paper by Cuneo)</li>
</ul>
<p>2. How do we know it?</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8212;  linguistic communication as a case of inference or inference to the best explanation (Keating)</li>
<li>&#8212;  linguistic communication as dependent on its author (Graheli)</li>
<li>&#8212;  linguistic communication as an independent instrument of knowledge (Nowakowska)</li>
</ul>
<p>3. What is the role of language as a medium?</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8212; The nature of the word-object relation (i.e., ancient Indian and Greek reflections on whether the dissymmetries (e.g. synonyms, homonyms, zero-morphs), which have to be described as a natural part of language, undermine the possibility of language&#8217;s being a reliable  means of knowledge or not, dealt with by Pontillo and Melis)</li>
<li>&#8212; written vs. spoken language (Graheli)</li>
<li>&#8212; internalised vs. spoken words as carriers of the meaning (Saito)</li>
</ul>
<p>4. What is the role of the social context?</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8212; Failures of communication due to language (Jakubczak)</li>
<li>&#8212; Social setting (Lauri)</li>
</ul>
<p>In case you are confused, the program of the panel was the following:<br />
Elisa Freschi, Introduction</p>
<p>Monika Nowakowska, Truthfulness and Credibility in an Indian Hermeneutical Context</p>
<p>Elisa Freschi, Conveying Prescriptions: The Mīmāṃsā Understanding of How Prescriptive Texts Function</p>
<p>Malcolm Keating, Indication as Verbal Postulation</p>
<p>Daniele Cuneo, Affective Knowledge as the Aim of Poetic Language. Crossings among Sanskrit Aesthetics, Western Hermeneutics and Contemporary Psychology</p>
<p>Marzenna Jakubczak, What Cognitive Benefits May Arise from the Collision Between Language and Metaphysics? Sāṅkhya-Yoga Perspective</p>
<p>Alessandro Graheli, Epistemology of Verbal and Written Testimony</p>
<p>Akane Saito, Internalization of Speech: Perception and Understanding of the Word</p>
<p>Tiziana Pontillo, Does Dissymmetric Signification Rely on Conventional Rules? Two Ancient Indian Answers</p>
<p>Valeria Melis, Does Dissymmetric Signification Rely on Conventional Rules? Two Ancient Greek Answers</p>
<p>Marco Lauri, “I’ve told a Story in Order to Make a Case for the Truth” Storytelling, Knowledge and Social Agency in some Medieval Arabic Texts</p>
<p>Roundtable Discussion</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			

		<wfw:commentRss>https://elisafreschi.com/2015/06/12/linguistic-communication-as-an-instrument-of-knowledge-a-panel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
				<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1727</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>