<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>elisa freschiIs there non-processed perception? The McGurk effect &#8211; elisa freschi</title>
	<atom:link href="https://elisafreschi.com/2015/03/25/is-there-non-processed-perception-the-mcgurk-effect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://elisafreschi.com</link>
	<description>These pages are a sort of virtual desktop of Elisa Freschi. You can find here my cv and some random thoughts on Sanskrit (and) Philosophy. All criticism welcome! Contributions are also welcome!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 12:52:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Is there non-processed perception? The McGurk effect</title>
		<link>https://elisafreschi.com/2015/03/25/is-there-non-processed-perception-the-mcgurk-effect/</link>
		<comments>https://elisafreschi.com/2015/03/25/is-there-non-processed-perception-the-mcgurk-effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 20:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elisa freschi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[epistemology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pramāṇavāda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auditory perception]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elisafreschi.com/?p=1543</guid>

				<description><![CDATA[The McGurk effect is a well-known experiment in which, while hearing a given phoneme and seeing someone pronouncing another phoneme, we &#8220;hear&#8221; the second one instead of the first one, the correct one. This seems to mean that the auditory perception of a phoneme is already processed, it is savikalpa. Try the McGurk effect in [&#8230;]]]></description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The McGurk effect is a well-known experiment in which, while hearing a given phoneme and seeing someone pronouncing another phoneme, we &#8220;hear&#8221; the second one instead of the first one, the correct one. This seems to mean that the auditory perception of a phoneme is already processed, it is <em>savikalpa</em>. Try the McGurk effect in the following video:<br />
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="100%" height="353" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/G-lN8vWm3m0?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><div style="margin-bottom: 10px; border: 1px #999999 solid; background-color: #eaeaea; padding: 6px 6px 6px 6px;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:10px;text-align:center;">If you can&rsquo;t see this video in your RSS reader or email, then <a href="https://elisafreschi.com/2015/03/25/is-there-non-processed-perception-the-mcgurk-effect/" title="Is there non-processed perception? The McGurk effect">click here</a>.</div></p>
<p>Now, the problem is that, after many trials, this does not work with me. I guess that this might have to do with the fact that I am not an English Native speaker and that, accordingly, I process the image of someone pronouncing the second phoneme in a non-automatic way (after all, /f/ as pronounced in my native language is probably not pronounced with the same lip movement).<br />
<strong>What do you think, does it work with you? If yes or if no, what is your native language</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			

		<wfw:commentRss>https://elisafreschi.com/2015/03/25/is-there-non-processed-perception-the-mcgurk-effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
				<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1543</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>