<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>elisa freschiAre we sure we are appealing to &#8220;common&#8221; sense and not just to &#8220;English common sense&#8221;? &#8211; elisa freschi</title>
	<atom:link href="https://elisafreschi.com/2015/01/29/are-we-sure-we-are-appealing-to-common-sense-and-not-just-to-english-common-sense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://elisafreschi.com</link>
	<description>These pages are a sort of virtual desktop of Elisa Freschi. You can find here my cv and some random thoughts on Sanskrit (and) Philosophy. All criticism welcome! Contributions are also welcome!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 12:52:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Are we sure we are appealing to &#8220;common&#8221; sense and not just to &#8220;English common sense&#8221;?</title>
		<link>https://elisafreschi.com/2015/01/29/are-we-sure-we-are-appealing-to-common-sense-and-not-just-to-english-common-sense/</link>
		<comments>https://elisafreschi.com/2015/01/29/are-we-sure-we-are-appealing-to-common-sense-and-not-just-to-english-common-sense/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 13:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>elisa freschi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[comparative philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deontic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elisafreschi.com/?p=1368</guid>

				<description><![CDATA[How much of our philosophical ideas are in fact conditioned by the language we use? You can read, for instance, these critical comments on the Ten Commandments and their form in Hebrew. One way to avoid the risk of mistaking the appeal to one&#8217;s intuition with the appeal to one&#8217;s working language, is to test [&#8230;]]]></description>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much of our philosophical ideas are in fact conditioned by the language we use?<br />
You can read, for instance, <a href="http://peasoup.typepad.com/peasoup/2014/12/ordinary-language-or-just-ordinary-english.html?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+typepad%2Fpeasoup+%28PEA+Soup%29" target="_blank">these</a> critical comments on the Ten Commandments and their form in Hebrew. One way to avoid the risk of mistaking the appeal to one&#8217;s intuition with the appeal to one&#8217;s working language, is to test one&#8217;s ideas within different cultural milieus (see, in this regard, <a href="http://philosopherscocoon.typepad.com/blog/2015/01/why-testing-logic-or-philosophy-in-general-on-non-western-ideas.html" target="_blank">this</a> post).<br />
On a related vein, you might want to check <a href="http://yetanotherphilosophersblog.blogspot.co.at/2014/10/is-linguistic-bias-unfair-or-just.html" target="_blank">this</a> and similar posts by Gabriele Contessa on the need for Analytic Philosophy to welcome more scholars <em>not</em> having English as their mother tongue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			

		<wfw:commentRss>https://elisafreschi.com/2015/01/29/are-we-sure-we-are-appealing-to-common-sense-and-not-just-to-english-common-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1368</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>